Online Journal
電子ジャーナル
IF値: 1.878(2021年)→1.8(2022年)

英文誌(2004-)

Journal of Medical Ultrasonics

一度このページでloginされますと,Springerサイト
にて英文誌のFull textを閲覧することができます.

cover

1992 - Vol.19

Vol.19 No.06

Original Article(原著)

(0416 - 0424)

ドプラ断層法によるα1遮断薬の腎血流に及ぼす影響の検討―腎葉間動脈血流速度からの考察―

Evaluation of α1 Blockade Effect on Renal Blood Flow by 2-D-Color Doppler Technique -Discussion on Renal Blood Flow Velocity of Interlobar Arteries-

中島 明彦1, 川内 章裕2, 松崎 明廣1, 小澤 優樹1, 伴 良雄1, 片桐 敬1

Akihiko NAKAJIMA1, Akihiro KAWAUCHI2, Akihiro MATSUZAKI1, Masaki OZAWA1, Yoshio BAN1, Takashi KATAGIRI1

1昭和大学医学部第三内科学教室, 2昭和大学医学部外科学教室

1The Third Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, 2Department of Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine

キーワード : A1 Blockade, Renal blood flow, 2-D-color Doppler technique, Interlobar artery (ILA)

We purposed to evaluate the effects of A1 blockade (Urapidil) on the renal blood flow and consequent renal function by using the 2-D-color Doppler technique. The subjects were 13 healthy male volunteers (average: 35 years old; 25-44) and 15 hypertensive cases (6 males and 9 females, average: 59 years old; 45-75). 30 mg and 45 mg A1 blockade (Urapidil) had been randomly given to these controls and patients. Blood pressure, heart rate, and renal blood flow were measured after a 30-minute rest, before the administration of the drug, and one and two hours after the administration. To measure the renal blood flow, ultrasonic diagnostic equipment SSA-270A (Toshiba Co., Ltd.) with a sector electric-phased 3.75 MHz. array probe was used. Doppler siftgrams of the interlobar artery (ILA) in the right kidney were recorded. Then, we calculated their velocities and parameters. (1) controls: In the 30 mg group, both renal blood maximum velocity (Vmax) and minimum velocity (Vmin) of ILA did not show significant changes although the Vmax/Vmin ratio and resistance index tended to decrease. In the 45 mg group, although both Vmax and Vmin were subject to significant reductions, the Vmax/Vmin ratio and resistance index showed no significant changes. (2) patients: In hypertensive groups (both 30 mg and 45 mg), neither Vmax nor Vmin of ILA showed any significant changes although the Vmax/Vmin ratio and resistance index showed significant reductions. In particular, the resistance index was proportional to vascular resistance. This reduction meant a reduction of vascular resistance of the ILA, namely the expansion of the vascular diameter, indicating that it may lead to an increase of renal blood flow in the case of constant velocity. Our results indicated that in hypertensive cases, the administration of A1 blockade (Urapidil) led to a significant increase of renal blood flow, suggesting that A1 blockade may affect renal function favorably.